Our post today is about a topic I have often encountered as an alternative assets manager: whether to engage in a lease or management agreement for parking garages in your portfolio.
I’ve fielded a lot of questions on what a management agreement actually is for third-party services and why they should be used, so just to clarify here: a management agreement is simply a contract in which the property owner or manager (client) outlines a scope of services that the third-party (operator) will perform in exchange for a management fee. Assuming the business is profitable, as parking garages often are, the management fee is considered an expense and after all expenses are paid, the net income belongs to the client. There’s no rule to how management fees are calculated, and they differ across alternative assets, but they are always negotiated. Management agreements include all the standard language on insurance, standard of care, operator representations, term, and compensation.
Typically, owners and managers who have parking garages in their portfolio will opt to lease it out instead. Here we will explore three metrics of the management agreement vs. lease decision: control, flexibility, and financial upside.
CONTROL
One of the most often cited reasons for why real estate owners engage in leases of their garages is because a management agreement requires too much co-management. The real estate guys don’t know about parking, and they don’t want to get involved. Makes sense. But in no way does a management agreement shift any day-to-day operational burden on the client. The parking professionals will run the day-to-day in a management agreement just as they would in a lease.
The “oversight” or “control” that is valuable in a management agreement is not in regard to co-managing a parking business, but rather in areas related to the core business interests of the client: customer service requirements, approval protocols, cleanliness, cooperation on marketing, and the ability to set and push budget targets. All of these important issues can be written into a management agreement and yet none have really anything to do with parking.
These measures are also good for the operator as well, ensuring that the business is being operated within the guidelines and best business interests of the client.
FLEXIBILITY
Terms for leases can be anywhere from 5 to 20 years. As I’m sure most of you have experienced, lease terms in general are difficult to amend mid-term and early termination clauses can be onerous. Management agreements are typically 3 to 5 years, often with 30- to 90-day termination clauses for the client. I’ll admit, this metric is pretty much a one-way benefit for the client.
FINANCIAL UPSIDE
Another often cited reason for engaging in a lease is that it provides a guaranteed income stream. The guaranteed income logic is true, if all market and business conditions remain unchanged. And that logic is also true with a management agreement, since the income to the property owner will be steady just as with a lease.
If, however, market conditions deteriorate, and parking garage occupancy decreases due to competition or other market factors, that guaranteed income stream doesn't stay guaranteed. Expecting a third-party operator with no ownership stake in the business to come out of pocket to make a lease payment is wishful thinking. The result is either a renegotiation of the lease payment, nonpayment, or some other stalemate. Thus, the financial outcome in a down market is no different than in a management agreement.
As for upside, in a management agreement there is opportunity for both client and operator to earn more. In a business setting where both parties have agreed to a detailed scope of service, the operator is operating within the budget and abiding by the operational expectations of the owner, the business will be set up to thrive.
In a lease, payment to the client is limited to the lease payment, with the possible exception of escalations. The operator will typically earn 100% of the upside in excess of the lease payment. With a management agreement however, utilizing a base and variable management fee, every dollar of net income can be split in a variety of ways between the owner and operator. Incentives are aligned, the goals are mutual, and it is not zero-sum.
In practice, then, a lease has the same downside exposure as a management agreement and far less upside potential for the client. From the operator’s perspective, they might argue that they earn less money in a management agreement. My opinion is that view is a little shortsighted: a well-structured management agreement creates a partnership between the two parties, aligns incentives, clearly communicates expectations, and better positions the business for financial success.
When you’re deciding next time between a lease and management agreement, keep these points in mind. If you, as a garage owner, value control, flexibility, financial upside, and having your operator as a well-informed partner, strongly consider a management agreement. If you’d like to learn more or see how JDF can help in a lease vs. management agreement decision, please contact us.